LLB Case Study Guidance
Running head: LLB CASE STUDY GUIDANCE 1
LLB CASE STUDY GUIDANCE 5
LLB Case Study Guidance
Read also: "Academic Book Review: How to Complete It"
III. SUMMARY (100-200 words)
Provide a summary in your own words on the article you requested to read and analyze in the following space.
The reason for preparing this Performance Measurement Framework is to give an approach for the systematic collection, analysis, utilization, and reporting on the productivity of the Canadian Transportation Agencys activities and programs. This framework manages, monitors, and reports on the agencys organization-wide fiscal performance. Through the established systems, the Agency utilizes concrete, objective data and information on which to make informed management decisions. It then reports to customers, Canadians and all other stakeholders. A performance measurement is not like an exact science since accurate data do not sufficiently explain the cost of acquiring reprocessed information. The cost-effective and practical approach enables the Agency to integrate performance measurement into various managerial tasks. CTAs performance measurement faces the challenge of the lack of a clear link between Agencys decisions and the final efficiency of the national transportation system.
IV. KEY LEARNING POINTS
Identify the key learning points in the read and analyze assigned activity.
To develop a consistent process to guide CTA, there should be clarity in the definition of outcomes and results. It is beneficial to have simplicity and cost-effectiveness as the key features of the performance measurement system involving data collection. Further, the performance measurement system must not be punitive; rather, it should be positive. It is worth noting that performance indicators must be simple, reliable, valid, affordable, and relevant to the activity or the process under measurement. On an ongoing basis, there should be a review of performance indicators. This is because, through gaining experience, refining and improving the process becomes simple.
V. RELEVANT STATEMENTS TO THE SESSION
While reading, identify the relevant statements to the session, and insert them in order in the following space.
The process of the program management is largely a generic one that guides the results of an organization at strategic, organizational, and program levels. The process itself comprises of activities, inputs and outputs, strategic outcomes and ultimate results. The usefulness of the process is aiding and focusing the idea of what to measure. Different level of results can be analyzed through outputs, outcomes, and ultimate results. This process is a sequence of cause-effect relationships, whereby each level relates to the next one through achieving the previous one.
VI. CRITICAL ANALYSIS
This is the most important section in your analysis. To complete it successfully, learner is to consider the following guiding steps:
Present arguments coherently, supported by evidence and facts to substantiate on why you may take a particular stance and/ or position towards a particular approach whether against or in support of it;
Capable of bridging the gap between the theory and conceptual work with the application under consideration.
The aim of the framework is to integrate the generic program management process within the existing programs and key initiatives by developing and implementing the new system. This allows clear definition, measuring, monitoring, and reporting on the key outcome for each of the CTAs programs in a consistent fashion. This strengthens the decision-making through the provision of objective information on determining if things are being done the right way. In addition, it can lead to the achievement of the agencys strategic outcomes.
VII. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
How could you apply the subject matter from the article in a real business case?
It is important to develop an indispensable results chain, which demonstrates how organizations activities and outputs lead to the achievement of the definitive results. Formation of a results chain forms a link of resources, outputs, and activities related to the strategic outcomes and ultimate results. Among the definitive results to be achieved is development of an accessible, efficient, and proficient national transport system. It takes a longer span to overcome the ultimate outcome. Therefore, the results chain aids the recognition of strategic outcomes that show the progress. A good results chain should be developed following initiation of new programs in any organization. This is because the results determine the best output to produce and activities to perform. The determination of financial and human resources inputs occurs according to the key required activities.
VIII. LEARNING REFLECTIONS
What have you learnt? Critical thinking is about lessons learnt to be drawn from the analysis.
Measuring performance on an ongoing basis needs identification and selection of performance indicators that portrays a products effectiveness. There should be a key driver behind doing a program or initiative. It is imperative know what the organization ultimately supposes to achieve regardless of the time span. There should be a clear motive of what it is expected to hear following the established outputs and activities. The strategic outcomes often referred to as the behavioral changes arise because of the performed work.
The outputs, activities, and inputs are effectively the operational elements required in order to achieve the strategic outcomes. There should be a clear list of activities to engage in contributing to the strategic outcomes. There are four main criteria used when determining the suitable indicators. First is validity, which is precision of the indicator in measuring the results. Next is relevance to the measured activity, product, or process. Third is reliability, which is determined through consistency over time. It comes because of perfecting the processes. Simplicity means that the information should be available and feasible to collect and analyze. The results of the analysis should motivate and provide the realization of changes. The last one is affordability that guarantees the collection and analysis of information. It must be up to the stakeholders expectations.