Jul 24, 2019 in Exploratory

The Power of Fusion Energy


Fusion power suggests the perspective of a nearly unlimited source of energy for the future generations. Nevertheless, fusion power also presents insuperable scientific and engineering challenge. The major hope is centered on tokamak reactors, which can magnetically restrain deuterium-tritium plasma. Therefore, in case nuclear fusion reactors work, they will provide practically limitless power for the unspecified future. This can be explained by fuel, standing for the hydrogen isotopes, which are substantially unrestricted on the planet. All attempts to control the fusion procedure and gear it to generate power have been seriously developed in the U.S. and other countries for more than forty years. The topic is highly interesting, as the fusion power is believed to be a power of future. If people become capable of releasing the controlled fusion power energy gradually, it will definitely become the ultimate energy form on the planet. Moreover, this energy is clean, as it does not produce any greenhouse gasses emissions thus dealing with the constantly growing problem of global warming. The current paper will identify the main themes and trends in research of fusion power, including the overall fusion technology, approaches to fusion energy, and assessment of fusion energy utilization and production.

Fusion Technology

Nuclear fusion is one of the most energy producing processes discovered in present time.  This process occurs simultaneously in the Sun where two hydrogen atoms collide together at a very high speed producing an enormous amount of energy. The vigorous collision between the two atomic nuclei allows them to join together forming a new heavier atom called Helium.  Every second, the Sun transforms 600 million tons of hydrogen into helium producing tremendous amount of energy that reaches the Earth over 150 million km away as sunlight energy.  However, with the technology and the tools people have now it is not possible to use common hydrogen as a reactant. Instead, researchers use isotopes of hydrogen such as deuterium and tritium, although the procedure is still not fully completed due to the input of energy needed for fusion to occur. In addition, intense pressure required to fuse the two atoms together is sill unachievable. However, the scientists believe that in the near future it will be feasible. If fusion were to work, people would obtain around 17.6 million electron volt per fusion that would provide them with an almost inexhaustible source of energy. Stephen Hawking also had the same opinion on the issue. According to him, “I would like nuclear fusion to become a practical power source. It would provide an inexhaustible supply of energy, without pollution or global warming”. This indicates the way this energy can be utilized to fulfill people’s needs and still have exceedingly more energy to use, so that the energy supply never ends.  Nuclear fusion plants will have the ability to perform fusion reactions constantly, without having the threat of reactor meltdown because the process of fusion does not undergo chain-reactions.  Furthermore, unlike other radioactive reactions, fusion only has two products, a helium atom and a fast neutron, which do not release any radioactive waste. Despite the fact that nuclear fusion procedure is known, no one has yet achieved it because of the high energy needed to be input.

In case of the Sun, solid gravitational powers equip appropriate circumstances for fusion. In case of the Earth, it is much more complicated to obtain analogous results. It means that fusion fuel, which stands for various hydrogen isotopes, has to be inflamed to extreme temperatures in order to reach 100 million degrees Celsius. It also has to be maintained concentrated enough and restrained for long enough to provide the nuclei a possibility to fuse. The current technology suggests that the most aptly probable reaction lies between the two heavy form nuclei of hydrogen, standing for tritium (T) and deuterium (D). Every T-D fusion occasion dismisses 17.6 MeV (multiples of electron volt). Deuterium appears congenitally in seawater in quantities of 30 grams per cubic meter. These figures make it highly plentiful in comparison with other energy resources. On the other hand, Tritium appears congenitally merely in imprint amounts, which are produced by cosmic rays. This isotope is radioactive, having a half-life of approximately 12 years. Practical amounts can be created in a traditional nuclear reactor or they can be created in a fusion set-up from lithium. The last can be found in huge amounts (30 particles per million) in the peel of the Earth and in smaller densities in the sea.

Thus, the neutrons obtained from the T-D fusion reaction will be captured in a blanket implicating lithium surrounding the core in a fusion reactor. The lithium will be modified into tritium, which is utilized to power the reactor, and helium. The asperity lies in the possibility to evolve an appliance which can inflame the T-D fuel to a high enough temperatures and sustain it for a long enough period, so that more energy is dismissed via fusion reactions than is utilized to make the reaction itself.

Approaches to Fusion Energy

When nuclear fusion was discovered, scientists have found two major approaches to produce this energy, which are Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) and Magnetic Confinement Fusion (MCF). Until present day, scientists are still focusing on those two ways of nuclear energy production.  Although they are the same approaches used 50 years ago, they went through a lot of modifications and improvements to get closer to completion. The inertial confinement fusion uses an intense beam of radiation that is fired toward a spherical fuel pellet, which produces the needed energy for fusion. The reacting fuel is maintained by its inertia, in order to generate sufficient amount of energy for that beam. Furthermore, this whole process is repeated many times per second to produce the fusion power. However, this power is not enough because it does not reach a point called “ignition” where the heating process cause a chain reaction that burns a significant portion of the fuel. Normally, when the laser beam is fired on the fuel pellet, only a very small portion of the undergoes fusion, that is why no one yet has succeeded in producing the desired nuclear energy. The other approach is Magnetic Confinement Fusion, which uses magnetic field to keep the hot fusion fuel in the form of plasma. The same problem that occurs in the first method also occurs here: it is difficult to sustain hot plasma for a long period of time to reach ignition. Scientists are optimistic on this approach because it gives more desirable results than the Inertial Confinement Fusion.


Magnetic Confinement

In case of magnetic confinement fusion, hundreds of cubic meters of T-D plasma at a concentration of less than a milligram per cubic meter are restrained by magnetic field at a several atmospheres pressure and inflamed to specific fusion temperature. Magnetic fields are perfect for retraining plasma due to the fact that the electrical charges of the excluded ions and electrons make them adhere to the magnetic field lines. The main objective is to impede the fractions from contacting with the reactor walls. This will also help in dissipating their warmth and assist in decelerating them. Tokamak is a device that utilizes magnetic field to confine hot plasma in the reactor vessel and prevent any heat leakage. Since Soviet physicist firstly built the Tokamak in the 1950s, it became the greatest tool in the journey to seek fusion energy. Tokamaks are highly useful, as the current flowing via the plasma also operates in order to inflate it to a temperature of more than 10 million degrees Celsius. Soviet physicists created the tokamak, which operated in restricted parameters beyond which unexpected detriments of energy restrain (meaning disruptions) might appear, provoking significant thermal and mechanical tensions to the structure and walls. This design is believed to be the most perspective one. Numerous investigations are also carried out on various kinds of stellarators. Due to the fact that stellarators do not have a toroidal plasma current, the overall plasma solidity is elevated in comparison with the above-mentioned tokamaks. Moreover, due to the fact that inflaming plasma can be more aptly controlled and monitored, stellerators demonstrate an genuine prospective for fixed-state, uninterrupted capacity. The only disadvantage concerns the fact that stellarators are much more complex in their shape, thus they are more complicated than tokamaks in concerns of designing and construction.

Inertial Confinement

The inertial confinement fusion is an innovative branch of research. This approach suggests that ion or laser beams are concentrated quite accurately on the exterior of a target. The last concerns a granule of T-D fuel, which has several millimeters in its diameter. This allows heating the exterior ply of the material, which detonates outside producing an inside-moving constringency front or implosion, which presses and inflames the internal plies of material. The fuel nucleus can be pressed to one thousand times in regards with its liquid concentration, resulting in specific circumstances which allow fusion to appear. Thus, the dismissed energy could inflame the ambient fuel.

Assessing Fusion Power


Fusion power demonstrates a number of possible advantages. This energy has potential benefits, as it is believed to be a sustainable, safe, and environmentally friendly source of energy for electricity generation. Firstly, the deuterium fuel, which is obtained from water, is globally accessible and substantially exhaustless fuel supply. Tritium is produced from lithium, which is spread in the crust of the Earth. The known reserves of the last are believed to last for more than a thousand of years even if all global electricity has to be produced with a help of fusion. The evolvement of advanced fusion reactors will lead to the fact that pure deuterium composites can be easily utilized in the future, which means that the Earth’s fuel capacity would proceed for billions of years. Secondly, fusion reaction presents no chemical combustion products, therefore, there are no contributions to atmospheric or water pollution. Thirdly, fusion is relevant for the production of ground-load electricity, while hydrogen generation is considered to be a sustainable, carbon dioxide-free energy mixture. The usage of fusion power plants can seriously lower the environmental influences of elevating global electricity requirements, since, similarly to nuclear fission power, these plants would not provoke or cause acid rains or the greenhouse effects. Fusion power can aptly gratify the energy requirements connected with incessant economic development and enlargement due to the organized accessibility of fuels. Moreover, there would be no hazard of a fugitive fusion reaction due to the fact that this is actually improbable and any malfunction would provoke a high-speed occlusion of the fusion power plant.


Nevertheless, despite the fact that fusion does not create long-lasting radioactive offsprings and the unburned gases can be dealt with in a plant, there would be short-term or even medium-term radioactive raffle issue caused by the energizing of the structural materials. A number of component materials might become radioactive within the life span of a reactor, caused by the disruption of the reactor with high-power neutrons. Therefore, these component materials will ultimately become radioactive raffle. The amount of this raffle might be analogous to the respective amounts from various fission reactors. On the other hand, the long-range radiotoxicity of the fusion raffle is believed to be significantly lower than radiotoxicity appearing from actinides in utilized fission fuel. Furthermore, the energizing product raffle would be dealt with in absolutely analogical manner as the raffle appearing from fission reactors after some years of functioning.


There are also other concerns, especially regarding probable dismissal of tritium into the environment. Tritium is known to be radioactive and very complicated to restrain due to the fact that it can transfuse rubber, concrete, and a variety of steel grades. Tritium is known to be an isotope of hydrogen, thus, it can aptly become encompassed into water, causing the weak level of water radioactivity. This isotope has a half-life of approximately 12 years, which makes the appearance of tritium remainders a serious menace to health during approximately 125 years after its creation, both in form of gas or liquid. Tritium remainders can be breathed in, accumulated via the skin, or even consumed. Breathed in tritium conveys all the way through the soft tissues, while tritium-saturated water can easily and rapidly mix with all the water in the body. Despite the fact that there is merely a minimum tritium inventory in a fusion reactor (a couple of grams), each of these grams could presumably dismiss huge amounts of tritium in the operation process via standard outflows, including the best containment systems. Any accident might dismiss even higher quantities, provoking much more serious outcomes. This is a major reason of why long-range hopes concern the deuterium-tritium fusion operations, which dispense the tritium as an isotope.

Despite the fact that fusion power obviously has a lot to suggest to the planet after the complete and ultimate technology development, the issues connected with fusion power should also be addressed, especially if this power will become a widely utilized future energy source.


The current literature presents adequate and full explanations and assessment of fusion power. The literature demonstrates full review and explication of fusil energy technologies. It explains the differences between original Sun fusion energy and complexity of obtaining the energy on the Earth. The researchers demonstrate that the technology and the tools that people currently have do not provide the possibility to use common hydrogen as a reactant, which explains why the scientists use isotopes of hydrogen such as deuterium and tritium. The literature defines that the procedure is still not fully completed due to the input of energy needed for fusion to occur. The researches utilized in the paper demonstrate different approaches to fusion energy, explicating the procedures involved, possible complications, and benefits. The literature also demonstrates which of the approaches is more advantageous and more likely to be used in the future. Finally, the existing researches properly assess the topic, defining both advantages and disadvantages of fusion energy usage. Regardless of the fact that fusion energy is believed to be sustainable and environmentally-friendly, it can be quite hazardous to the environment and people due to its radioactive product materials.

The literature is strong in overall presentation of genuine facts and figures connected to the topic of fusion energy. The research papers and articles provide all necessary information for the overall understanding of the current development of fusion energy and its future route. The literature does not hide negative facts concerning fusion energy, which can avert people from the idea that fusion energy is a best future option of the most sustainable energy resource. It vividly demonstrates the complicated procedures involved in the production of this energy and probable outcomes of such operations.

The literature might be considered weak in terms of transparency, as the language of research is highly scientific, abundant in terms, which are typically not explained, and provides detailed descriptions of processes, which might not be understandable for the ordinary reader. Moreover, the literature does not present the possible dates of fusion energy usage. All of the researches are dedicated to experimental usage; none of them demonstrates the possibility of actual transition from experimental procedures to full-scale energy-producing fusion energy plants.

Therefore, the research of potential full-scale electricity-supplying fusion energy plants might be considered a next step of research. Such analysis will obviously demonstrate real strengths and weaknesses of fusion power, fusion energy real level of sustainably, and its actual environmental help. Each project design demonstrates the planned objectives of plant activity. The analysis of these objectives and the assessment of potential full-scale electricity-supplying fusion energy plants will turn the theoretical information into practical data, which will definitely cover existing gaps.


Related essays