Narrator in Cathedral
The narrator in Cathedral shares his experience with his wifes friend who is blind. The blind man named Robert visits the narrators home, and the narrator is disturbed. The narrator refers Robert as the Blind man. He cannot understand how and why Robert visits them. Fortunately, the narrators experience with Robert makes him change his attitude toward blind people. It also changes his relationship with his wife (Carver, 1989). From the story, the reader understands that the act of looking is not just about physical vision but also requires a deeper level of understanding.
The fact that the narrator does not like the blind man at the beginning of the story is ironic. The narrator is initially limited to his personal sight. His experience with Robert shows his restrictions in terms of his perspective towards life and the blind, and his relationship with his wife. The fact that the blind man and his wife were once married makes him feel insecure. This exposes his crudeness and negativity. He communicates with a heinous humour, indicating how separate he was from his wife. His perceptible honesty hides his jealousy of the former relationship between his wife and Robert (Carver, 1989).
The narrators experience with Robert makes him realize a lot about himself. According to his wife, he is always lonely. He spends the night watching the television when the wife sleeps. This indicates that there is a deprived relationship between him and his wife. It also shows that the narrator is separated from the society. Additionally, the narrator is isolated. This indicates his obstinate close-mindedness, evidently in his pre-convinced concepts and feelings of blindness. The narrator does not get love from critics and readers. He has some perceptions about misguided notion about blind individuals. The narrator is not honest with the reader. The narrator points out that the blindness idea originated from films with blindness being so far and unfamiliar to the narrator. The idea of blindness came from the movies (Carver, 1989). He declares that he has never encountered a blind person. The narrator does not point out what is personally bothering him. However, it is clear that he is figuratively blind. At the beginning of the story, the narrator does not see who he is, who his wife is and who Robert is. In fact, he is blind to the extent that he cannot recognize his life. As the story develops, the narrator puts himself in the blind mans shoes. The narrator is in a rut. He fears that when Robert comes, he will see his wife and Robert as more than friends. However, the narrator fails to pursue this intuition. The main reasons for him not pursuing this instinct is because he understands how foolish he has been. He understands that Robert and the narrators wife are just friends.
Read also: "Academic Book Review: How to Complete It"
When the threat is eliminated, the narrator progressively tells Robert the truth. He does this with an aim of showing his wife that he loves her. The narrator decides to be nice to Robert, his wifes friend. He stops contending with Robert. Additionally, he sees a chance to test his supposition about the blind. He starts to empathize with the blind people such as Robert before they start designing the cathedral (Carver, 1989).
Although the Cathedral narrator is not plainly blind, he exhibits an absence of insight as well as self-awareness, which in many conducts, makes him more sightless than Robert. Contrasting Robert, the speaker can oversee with his own eyes well. However, he has hardships understanding individuals feelings and thoughts that recline underneath the surface. He shames the dead Beulah since Robert would never observe her and does not realize that Robert is capable of seeing Beulah in the nonphysical manner. That means that he could comprehend her confidentiality (Carver, 1989). Consequently, the speaker makes no exertion getting knowledge concerning his wife. However, he welcomes her old friends to his household. He merely classifies Robert as a part and parcel of his wifes history that makes him desirous, bitter and petty. He does not care whether the visit is essential to his woman. Also, he sees responsibility in that Robert might have carried out in assisting her through of her suicide effort and divorce. The speaker is envious of his own wifes ex-husband. However, cockily ensures that she revered a place in her life hood, supposing at a single point to catch her,, tells Robert concerning his spouse. However, all the comments he makes to his wife and everything he performs seems intended to anger and annoy her. Apart from being the dear husband, the narrator is arguable and insensitive having no notion of his wife. The reality that he can realize her on sight does not essentially mean that, he distinguishes her intimately (Carver, 1989).
In conclusion, the speaker draws the cathedral with Robert and shuts eyes. He proves an epiphany in the time he would see more using his bare eyes. The act of looking is not just about physical vision, but also requires a deeper level of understanding. While he is abrupt and flippant with Robert all the evening, he is obligated to talk with Robert. He does this at night when his wife is asleep. After a moment of clumsiness, the speaker eventually blows into clumsily detailing what is on the television. The speakers good purposes are ruined when he understands he is unable to detail the cathedral. Although he can see the church, he is not able to detail the church to Robert since he cannot see the interior importance. The action of sketching the cathedral to Robert with his eyes not opened lets the speaker observe his interior world and understand the deep meaning. As an outcome, his detailing of the church receipts on human elements that liberates the speaker and permits him to observe for the initial time.