Human Nature and Nation-States
Human nature has a direct relationship with the nation-states manifesting in the form of the elements of political realism that are dictated by human nature The extent to which there could be the establishment of the engagement and the continued association among the various groups and cultures within the confines of the nation-states is determined by the personalities established. The objectivity and the general planning of all the state activities are bound to be under the influence of human nature. The development of the rational theory is determined by the personal objectives that have been outlined. As such, the overall scope of development that would be feasible to attain from a nation-states perspective would emanate from the primary considerations at the time of goal setting. The value deduced from such planning is down to the principal aims that have been predetermined in light of the planning modalities. This paper intends to determine the extent to which human nature is relevant in explaining the relationship that could be established between nation-states.
The concept of human nature is critical in giving an account of the relationship between nation-states in the standing of war and peace. Human nature directly dictates the preferences that people tend to vouch for. As such, the desires are consistent with the perspectives that would be sought when the set expectations are not met. The natural intention is usually to meet the minimum need, and when the observed occurrences do not seem to be aligned with the goals initially outlined, it is inevitable that war would be the result. When the plans made and the eventual turn of events from them are in awe of the significant expectations, it is likely that peace would be prevalent. The state of a nation-state is, therefore, dependent on the essence of human nature in light of the preferences of individuals being at the forefront of establishing the dominant developmental activities that would be pursued.
Human nature primarily determines the social progress that is likely to be achieved in the nation-states. The ability of humankind is critical in yielding the state of development that is desired in the state. The planning activities are only feasible to keep up with as a result of the befitting environment being established. The developmental goals are set to be practical owing to the due assessment conducted by the individuals taking charge of the appropriate leadership positions. The element of human nature that is highlighted is also the determinant of the priority setting in the objectives. Among the projects that need to be pursued, human nature would dictate those that may be rolled out first so that when they are eventually implemented based on the layout established, the value that was projected remains on course for realization. The development of a state is; thus, sustainable when the most urgent needs are met. The protracted peace in the nation-states would also be consistent with global goals so that the positive perspectives coming from the same remain on course to translate to future progress.
The engagements in a nation-states setup that embraces peaceful coexistence would be in accord with the desire to empower the citizens. The recognition of the need for development would directly translate to opening up of ventures that create employment opportunities. The standards of living would be improved due to the creation of opportunities necessary for the betterment of per capita income. The peaceful coexistence recognizes that the realization of all the developmental goals starts from the opportunities created for individuals. The personal developments are replicated to the entire state. The resulting environment perpetually leads to improvements.
Read also: "Academic Book Review: How to Complete It"
Human nature directly leads to the development of the relationship between nation-states due to liberalism. Through nature, there is the emergence of the worldview of liberalism that dominantly vouches for equality and liberty. The essence of social liberalism that comes into the fold as because of human nature holds out for the inherent equality among people. As such, there would be the consideration given to the essence of the human rights. The elements of justice would also come into the fold in light of the desire to protect human rights. The relationship between nation-states is, therefore, bound to flourish when the fundamental rights of every citizen are observed. The general state of peace in such an environment is likely to be robust given the common causes of disharmony are aligned with the policies and laws enacted to uphold human rights.
Classical liberalism roots of liberty among citizens. Human nature serves to highlight the need for political freedom among citizens. Observation of the same is the onset of the respect accorded to the right of political choice. Individuals have the free will to participate in elections with the sole intent of electing the leaders with the ability to represent their political standpoints. Through liberalism, there is also the platform created to amount to flexibility so that the differences in the understanding of the principles of liberalism is accommodated. The fundamental freedoms in the shape of speech, religion, civil rights, free markets, and the freedom of the press would not be infringed upon. Such concepts are coined by the understanding espoused from human nature. The continued engagement and contact among the members of the society cements the relationship between states. The associations resulting from the closeness of individuals is a direct consequence of development.
The extent to which human nature helps in the explanation of the relationship between nation-states originates from the concept of realism. Human nature dictates that the actors in the political system of the nation-states are rational and the actions that they take thereof would be reflective of personal interests. Most of the decisions that are made in view of the governance of the nation states tend to be influenced significantly by the desires of the individuals at the helm of leadership. In the cases where policy making is required, it is common that the majority opinion of the representatives of the public would be sought. However, the decision that determines the popular opinion would be coined around the personal interests of the people taking part. The rationale behind this lies in the tendency of the participants in law making to team up based on their preferences to garner support for a single policy that would be an ultimate representation of the policies they stand for.
Human nature is the face of nation-states as a result of the desire for power being the basis of self-preservation. The activities planned in the nation-states are those that are in agreement with the important goals set to oversee the leadership frameworks. The deals brokered with other nation-states must look to be an equivalent of an ultimate gain for the states. The personal expectations of the citizens have to be reviewed each time there are new laws to be fronted so that the policies championed are consistent with the essence of democracy. Holding out for the interest of the citizens is the primary role of the nation-states. The regimes established have the basic intent of improving the living conditions of the citizens.
Human nature has a direct influence on the relationship between nation-states as a consequence of the observation of a defined natural law that recognizes the roles of everyone in the society. The essence of natural law holds that there should be the protection of the rights of all individuals and their health and right to life prioritized. The same is the reason for the protection that is accorded to citizens within a state . The abilities of humankind are imperative in the attainment of progress so that the aspects of infinitive violence are eradicated. As such, the peaceful coexistence in a state is attributed to the ability of people to recognize the merits of peace. The nature of humans is to take part in ventures that would always have the ultimate result of amounting to profits. The developmental orientation is an implication that there will be efforts made to indulge in constructive ventures so that the outcomes at the end of implementing the objectives result in an improvement of the standards of living.
In conclusion, human nature has been shown to be critical in portraying the relationship between nation-states. The organization of most projects is determined by the direct decision-making that comes from the personal desires of the individuals at the fore of leadership. The personal preferences are often shaped by the opinions as well as the preferences of the people who are represented. Humans have an inherent ability to rise above the basic instincts in the quest to realize social progress so that the overall developments are met. The recognition of the natural law would be the tenet for a peaceful coexistence. Observing that the rights of citizens need to be upheld would be crucial to the sustainability of governance of the states as a result of the precedents set to yield seamless planning.