Nov 14, 2020 in Politics


My Own Private Idaho, Gus Van Sant

1. The film titled My Own Private Idaho by Gus Van Sant can change one's political sensibility by evaluating the moral standards of an individual in comparison to those of the society.


2. a. The film highlights and puts to record the widespread sexual immorality in the society. b. Van Sant shows the challenge of strained relations as well as the difficulty of trying to start a new family. c. The story depicts the reality of homeless children sleeping with men for money. 3. Scene 1: Mike is gay, and he is not shy to reveal his feelings for Scott. On the other hand, Scott has a different point of view on the matter since he believes that it is not possible for two men to be in love. Scene 2: Mike and Scott make viewers understand how complicated relationships with parents can push children away from their families. Mike is struggling with the trauma after his mother has abandoned him. The two friends mix with a group of homeless boys to form their new family where they consider Bob as their new father. Scene 3: Mike is seen trying to connect with his past self, though there is the acknowledgment of the fact that he has already changed enormously. Suddenly, his life takes another dangerous turn from bad to worse, making him adjust to new circumstances and continue his journey.

4. Introductory paragraph: Sexual immorality and struggle to survive present the central themes of the film. The environment and society make characters feel deprived of their pride, changing them dramatically from who they used to be or wanted to become. Van Sant delineates the complex portraits of the main characters, which walk through their lives in a subculture that permits or even compels them to utilize their bodies for survival. Thus a question arises whether, after all, it is circumstances or their own morals that push them to make those choices.

Read also: "Academic Book Review: How to Complete It"

Works Cited

My Own Private Idaho. Dir. Gus Van Sant. Fine Line Features, 1991. Film.

Do the Right Thing, Spike Lee

1. Thesis: The film Do the Right Thing by Spike Lee does not succeed in influencing the political sensibilities of the audience. It fails to show the final reaction of the political environment towards the racial violence in the community. Nevertheless, love and hatred as the primary themes guiding the relationships of people in the society, .make one consider this story carefully.

2. a. Spike Lee puts more focus and attention on racial tensions that exist in the Brooklyn neighborhood. b. The effects of biased thinking and the unexpected outcomes of prejudice can destroy ones life instantly. c. According to Spike Lee, it is not possible to love and hate the same person at the same time.

3. Scene 1: People of different races try to coexist peacefully in the community until one day, when a spark of intolerance ignites recriminations. First major conflict arises when African American boys and girls flood the street thus impeding traffic. Scene 2: Raheem is trying to seek attention from people in the neighborhood by continually playing same loud music. While some people like and acknowledge it, others are very annoyed and despise it. Scene 3: At the end of the movie, Mookie and Sal reconcile after having experienced what hatred and intolerance cause.

10% word count difference
(300 words instead of
270 words per page)
15%ff for a first-time order

4. Introductory paragraph: The Do the Right Thing movies theme is questionable since it depicts violence as an alternative to solving problems. Thus, the film does not in any way contribute to shaping the political sensibility of the viewers. Racial hostility and lack of respect runs throughout the plot with different outcomes. As the movie ends, there are two quotes that seem to contradict each other: one calls for non-violent approach as an eye for an eye philosophy is a dead end, while the other one calls for violent as a means of self-defense when necessary. This confuses the audience, thus making the title of the movie look ambiguous.

Works Cited

Do the Right Thing. Dir. Spike Lee. Universal Pictures, 1989. Film.

Boyz N the Hood, John Singleton

1. In the movie Boyz N the Hood, John Singleton highlights several issues within a societal set-up which the authorities ought to consider for management. The movie can influence ones political sensibility as it shows the good and the negative side of the governments approach in addressing the societal challenges.

2. a. The movie addresses the inequality in gender and the low status of women in the society. b. The issue of violence and use of weapons is reflected extensively. c. John Singleton shows that every person has a chance for a better future, no matter what background they come from.

Order Your Essay

3. Scene 1: Furious Styles shows Tre and Ricky a billboard that is advertising cheap homes and explains his concerns regarding the governments attitude towards their community. The emphasis is on the need to keep the neighborhood occupied by black people only. Scene 2: In the middle of the film, Tre gets a painful experience with the rough police officers who, at one point, put a gun to his head to intimidate and make him weak. This unjustified violence makes Tre sad and angry at the same time. Scene 3: From the encounter between Tre and his girlfriend after Ricky dies, it is evident that women are not supposed to ask men questions about their affairs since they are not perceived as equals.

4. Introductory paragraph: Boyz N the Hood is like a mirror image of the society where people of different races and social statuses struggle to survive and build their future. Although they are harassed by the police and practically abandoned by the government, young people still have a chance and desire to get a good education. Furthermore, gender discrimination presents an important line of the plot. Men regard women as their subordinates and not as equal partners. Lack of respect and severe poverty makes women desperate and bitter. In addition, residential segregation leads to conflicts when different rival groups want to rule in the neighborhood.


Related essays