What is the Obama Doctrine
There is an increased need to reduce the budget deficit and, at the same time, safeguard the key priorities especially in regards to the protection of domestic programs, national security and economic recovery. A bipartisan approach should be adopted in order to foster tax increases and reduce unnecessary spending. The idea is to raise revenue collection of an additional $975 billion in form of newer tax impositions. Through this, it is assumed that the nation will reduce the deficit of the federal budget by $ 1.85 trillion during the next decade. Statistically, this can be achieved by making the expenses on domestic program lowered by $ 493 billion, another $ 240 billion can be saved from the defense expenses and a further 242 billion from lower interest savings. There is also a possibility of saving $ 275 billion that can as well lower the amount of domestic expenses through the programs of federal healthcare.
In respect to Obama care, it is safe to indicate that the doctrine is of exceptionalism and isolationism nature. Consequently, the main foreign policy of President Barrack Obama is to end the war in Afghanistan. Retrospectively, another agenda of the President is to establish peace and stability in Muslim World, fighting global terrorists like Al-Qaeda. There has been a significant step made towards this point through the killing of its key leader Osama bin Laden. The main reason that the President gives in an effort to end the Afghanistan war is the continuous loss of American marines. This, in turn, has led to a significant loss within the overall American economy as families were left in poverty.
Read also: "Academic Book Review: How to Complete It"
Tax Increases and Spending Cuts
It is important to mention that a challenge lays ahead for all the people in respect to the tax increases and spending cuts. There is an increased need to reduce the budget deficit and, at the same time, safeguard the key priorities especially in regards to the protection of domestic programs, national security and economic recovery. That is the main rationale behind the advocating of a bipartisan approach that is to be adopted for the good of the nations economy.
In an effort to increase the revenue collection, an additional $975 billion can be raised in form of new tax impositions that is to be realized over the next decade. It is paramount to note that without the newer taxes, it is impossible to balance-off the budgets. This proposal will see the nation reduce the federal budget deficit by $ 1.85 trillion in the next decade. In order to realize this, the new taxes must be supplemented by expense cuts.
It is beneficial that the tax breaks, which only benefit corporations and upper income households, are closed in order to raise the $975 billion as revenue from the new taxes. Therefore, a bipartisan matching approach to raising $ 975 billion needs to be affected in activities related to expense reductions.
The expenses on domestic program can be lowered by $ 493 billion; another $ 240 billion can be saved from the defense expenses and a further 242 billion from lower interest savings. There is also a possibility of saving $ 275 billion that can as well lower the amount of domestic expenses through the programs of the federal healthcare.
Obviously, it is important to realize that a bipartisan approach will go a long way to save the economy of the nation. Notably, this can further be achieved by cutting down on spending across the board, which has been taking place within the recent past that will save about $ 85 billion. A $ 100 billion program can be created with an aim to generate new jobs by advocating for such activities as repairing the already aged infrastructure.
Consequently, the annual federal deficit can be eliminated in the next 10 years by reducing the amount of expenses over that period by $ 4.6 trillion. This is an option that can be agreed upon across the board in order to generate $ 600 billion annually over the next 10 years. This will be derived from the higher tax rates that are imposed on the upper income households. If this approach is agreed across the parties, there is a possibility to avert the increased taxes on all Americans.
Therefore, it should be noted that by assuming a bipartisan approach, the critical priorities of the nation will be safeguarded just like the national security and other domestic programs. This long term deficit reduction, which has spaned over a decade, offers the certainty to both the consumers and the businesses. Significantly, where there is a common good that will go a long way in benefiting the entire nation, then it is paramount that all individuals come together and put aside party politics in order to affect the most important duty of service to its people and bring prosperity. Therefore, there is an urge that the proposal, as discussed above, be adopted in a bipartisan approach in order to bring forth the prosperity to the nation through economic recovery and safeguarding of other critical domestic programs.
The Obama Doctrine
The Obama doctrine is of exceptionalism and isolationism nature. In one of his speeches, President Obama was heard defending his exceptionalism doctrine. The president declared that it is the willingness of Americans to act the way that makes them different and exceptional. He stated that the Americans act with a lot of humility and great resolve and, moreover, that America is exceptional, because for more than seven decades, it has anchored the global security. That other than forging agreements internationally, America undertakes to enforce them.
Foreign Policy of the Obama Administration
The main foreign policy of the President Barrack Obama is to end the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. His foreign policy is characterized by activism because by ending the War in both Iraq and Afghanistan he wants to refurbish the relationship and the face of the United States within the Muslim world. The foreign policy of the United States president is also characterized by the elements of stability and peace. It is demonstrated by such activities as creating peace with Iran, a good relationship with Russia to eliminate the nuclear weapon in the world, creating a good working relationship with China and seeking global and regional cooperation with other countries in order to ensure peace.
Obamas foreign policy is pragmatic in its nature that challenges him to depict a stronger desire to make necessary and fundamental changes within the United States.
The three major foreign policies of the president include: cooperation with other nations described as his allies, bringing to an end the war in Iraq and disassembling the Al-Qaeda leadership. In his foreign policy to end the Iraq war, the president cites the cries of the families of the American soldiers who went to fight outside their country. He asserted that some soldiers spend more time outside than they do with their families, something that is unacceptable. Children continue to grow without their complete families; spouses spend a lot of time worrying about the safety of their partners. Another disturbing part of the Iraq war is the number of American soldiers who lose their lives in the line of duty. The troops, in their call to serve in Iraq, also lose their lives. It is worth mentioning that a part of soldiers dying are very young, therefore they leave behind suffering spouses. It would be better, according to President Obama, to avoid this war that has caused more harm than good to the Americans.
In cooperation with his allies, the President has continued to reiterate that America is a friend to those who seek assistance in enhancing the prosperity and well being of the people. Obama has reached out to other countries in order to enhance a good relationship and plead with these countries to cut down on nuclear power. Also, the Obama administration continues to fight the global terrorists like Al-Qaeda and it was able to kill its key leader Osama bin Laden.
It is worth mentioning that there are foreign policies formulated, within the Obama administration, that are quite different from the past administrations. For instance, his efforts to end the war in Iraq and his doctrines are different policies pursued in comparison to those pursued by his predecessors.